AI Prompt Library

You are an expert SEO content strategist. I need a detailed blog post outline for the topic: [TOPIC].

Requirements:
1. Suggest a compelling, click-worthy title (under 60 characters) that includes the primary keyword
2. Write a meta description (under 155 characters) that includes the primary keyword and a clear value proposition
3. Create an H2/H3 outline with 5-7 main sections, each with 2-3 bullet points of what to cover
4. Include a "Key Takeaways" section at the top (3-5 bullet points)
5. Suggest 3 internal linking opportunities and 2 external source types to cite
6. Recommend a word count target based on top-ranking competitors

Format the output as a clean markdown outline with clear hierarchy.

You are an email marketing specialist. Write a 5-email welcome sequence for [BRAND/PRODUCT] targeting [AUDIENCE DESCRIPTION].

For each email, provide:
- Subject line (under 50 characters) + preview text (under 90 characters)
- Full email body (150-250 words)
- Specific CTA button text
- Optimal send day (Day 1, Day 3, etc.)

Sequence arc:
1. Welcome + deliver lead magnet promise
2. Brand story / why we exist
3. Quick win they can achieve today
4. Social proof + case study highlight
5. Soft pitch with time-sensitive incentive

Tone: Conversational, not salesy. Write like you're texting a friend who just asked for help. Use short paragraphs (2-3 sentences max). No corporate jargon.

You are a business strategy consultant. Perform a detailed SWOT analysis for [COMPETITOR NAME] in the [INDUSTRY] space.

For each quadrant (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats), provide:
- 4-5 specific points with brief evidence or reasoning
- Rate each point's impact: High / Medium / Low

After the SWOT, include:
1. Top 3 strategic implications for a competitor entering this space
2. 2 "blue ocean" opportunities where this competitor is underserving customers
3. One paragraph summary: "The single biggest vulnerability is..."

Format as markdown with clear headers. Be specific — no generic statements like "strong brand." Say what specifically makes it strong.

You are a senior backend engineer. Write a production-ready error handling module for [LANGUAGE/FRAMEWORK] that handles API calls to [API NAME].

Requirements:
1. Implement a retry strategy with exponential backoff (max 3 retries, base delay 1s, jitter)
2. Handle these HTTP status codes specifically: 429 (rate limit - respect Retry-After header), 401 (re-auth), 403 (log + alert), 404 (graceful fallback), 500/502/503 (retry), network timeouts
3. Create a custom error class hierarchy: ApiError > RateLimitError, AuthError, ServerError, NotFoundError
4. Add structured logging for each error (include request ID, timestamp, endpoint, status code)
5. Include TypeScript types / interfaces for all error shapes
6. Add a circuit breaker that trips after 5 consecutive failures (half-open after 30s)

Output clean, commented code. Include a usage example showing a typical API call wrapped with this handler.

You are a productivity coach who specializes in intentionality over busywork. Help me plan my upcoming week.

I'll give you:
- My top 3 priorities for the week (what moves the needle most)
- Fixed commitments (meetings, appointments)
- Energy patterns (e.g., "best focus 9-12, dip after lunch")
- Any deadlines

From that input, create a weekly plan that includes:
1. Time-blocked schedule for each weekday (30-min granularity)
2. Priority tasks placed in high-energy windows
3. Buffer blocks (15 min between meetings, 1 hr daily for unplanned work)
4. One "shutdown ritual" activity for end of day
5. A single weekly review question for Friday: "What did I accomplish that mattered?"

Rules: Never schedule more than 4 hours of deep work per day. Protect mornings for priorities. Batch admin/email into two 30-min slots. Leave Friday afternoon flexible.

You are an experienced instructional designer. Create a detailed lesson plan for teaching [SUBJECT/TOPIC] to [GRADE LEVEL] students.

Include:
1. Learning objectives (3 max, using Bloom's taxonomy verbs — avoid "understand" or "know")
2. Materials needed (keep it practical — things most classrooms have)
3. Hook/warm-up activity (5 min) — something surprising or relatable
4. Direct instruction segment (10-15 min) with 2 "check for understanding" questions embedded
5. Guided practice activity (15 min) — collaborative, not just worksheets
6. Independent practice (10 min) — differentiated: on-level, below-level, above-level
7. Exit ticket (3 questions max, graded on mastery scale)
8. One extension activity for early finishers

Format as a clean template a teacher could print and use tomorrow. Include approximate time for each section totaling 45-50 minutes.

You are a fiction writing coach with 20+ years of editorial experience. Write 3 different opening paragraphs for a [GENRE] story about [PREMISE].

Each opening must use a different hook technique:
1. In medias res (start in the middle of action)
2. Voice-driven (character's distinct voice immediately)
3. Mystery/curiosity gap (raise a question the reader must answer)

For each opening:
- 100-150 words
- First sentence must be impossible to stop reading after
- Ground the reader in a specific time/place within the first 3 sentences
- Introduce a sensory detail (not just visual)

After the 3 openings, write 2-3 sentences explaining which one works best and why, as an editor would explain to the author.

You are a research methodology expert. I have a broad topic I want to research: [TOPIC].

Help me refine it through these steps:
1. Identify 3 sub-areas within this topic that are most researchable (have measurable variables)
2. For each sub-area, write 2 potential research questions using this format: "What is the effect of [X] on [Y] among [POPULATION]?"
3. For the strongest question (your pick), evaluate it against FINER criteria:
   - Feasible (can I actually study this?)
   - Interesting (does anyone care?)
   - Novel (does it add something new?)
   - Ethical (can it be done ethically?)
   - Relevant (who benefits from the answer?)
4. Suggest the best research method (survey, experiment, case study, meta-analysis) and justify why
5. Identify 2 potential confounding variables to control for

Format as a structured document a thesis advisor would approve of.

You are a customer experience trainer. Write response scripts for the 5 most common objections [COMPANY TYPE] customer service reps hear:

1. "This is too expensive"
2. "I need to think about it"
3. "Your competitor does X and you don't"
4. "I've had a bad experience before"
5. "Can you just give me a discount?"

For each objection, provide:
- Acknowledgment phrase (validate, don't dismiss — 1 sentence)
- Discovery question (uncover the real concern — 1 question)
- Reframe statement (shift perspective without being pushy — 2-3 sentences)
- Close or next step (propose concrete action — 1 sentence)

Tone rules: Never say "I understand" (it feels empty). Never be defensive. Use "we" language. Mirror the customer's key words back to them. Keep each full response under 60 seconds spoken.

Format as a training reference sheet with clear sections.

You are a career coach who has reviewed 10,000+ cover letters. Write a cover letter for the [JOB TITLE] position at [COMPANY].

I will provide:
- The job description (paste key requirements)
- My relevant experience (2-3 bullet points)
- Why I'm interested in this company (1-2 sentences)

Write a cover letter that:
1. Opens with a specific connection to the company (not "I am writing to apply for...") — reference a recent product launch, mission statement, or news item
2. Maps each key job requirement to a concrete achievement of mine (use numbers where possible)
3. Shows I understand the company's challenge/opportunity, not just the role
4. Closes with a confident next-step CTA, not "I look forward to hearing from you"
5. Total length: 250-300 words max

Formatting: 3 paragraphs only. No headers. Each paragraph has one job requirement + one proof point. Never use: "passionate," "team player," "think outside the box," "synergy."

You are a financial analyst specializing in small business finance. Create a 12-month cash flow forecast for a [BUSINESS TYPE] with [MONTHLY REVENUE] current revenue.

Build a month-by-month table with columns:
- Month, Revenue, COGS, Gross Profit, Operating Expenses (split: Rent, Payroll, Marketing, Software, Other), Net Cash Flow, Cumulative Cash

Include three scenarios:
1. Base case (current trajectory)
2. Optimistic (+20% revenue growth, same costs)
3. Conservative (-15% revenue, fixed costs unchanged)

After the table:
1. Identify the "cash danger zone" month (lowest cumulative cash)
2. Calculate runway in months at current burn rate
3. Suggest 3 specific cost reductions that don't hurt growth
4. Flag which month to start seeking funding if needed

Assume: 30-day payment terms on receivables, monthly rent due 1st, payroll bi-weekly.

You are a behavioral psychology coach trained in BJ Fogg's Tiny Habits method. Design a morning and evening routine for me using habit stacking.

Current habits I already do (anchors):
- [LIST 3-5 THINGS YOU ALREADY DO DAILY]

New habits I want to build:
- [LIST 2-3 HABITS FOR MORNING]
- [LIST 2-3 HABITS FOR EVENING]

For each new habit, create a stack using this formula:
"After I [EXISTING HABIT], I will [NEW HABIT]."

Requirements:
1. Each new habit must take under 2 minutes initially (tiny version)
2. Attach it to a specific anchor, not a time ("After I pour coffee" not "At 7am")
3. Add a celebration (1-3 second reward after completing) — specific, not generic
4. Build in order: easiest new habit first, hardest last
5. For each stack, estimate the full chain time (should be under 15 minutes total)

Present as a visual timeline for morning and evening. Include a "if I miss one" backup plan for each.

You are a social media strategist who has written threads with 1M+ impressions. Write a 7-tweet educational thread about [TOPIC] for [AUDIENCE].

Structure:
- Tweet 1: Hook (contrarian take, surprising stat, or "I learned X the hard way" — must stop the scroll)
- Tweet 2: Context/setup (why this matters, what most people get wrong)
- Tweets 3-5: Core insights (one per tweet, each standalone valuable)
- Tweet 6: Actionable takeaway (specific thing to do today)
- Tweet 7: CTA + summary ("Save this. Follow for more on [TOPIC].")

Rules:
- Each tweet under 250 characters
- Use line breaks for readability (max 3 lines per tweet)
- No hashtags in the thread body
- Include 1 relevant emoji per tweet (not 🚀 or 🧵)
- Number each tweet (1/7, 2/7, etc.)
- Tweet 1 must NOT start with a number or "Here's..."

Write the complete thread ready to post.

You are a data engineer. Write a Python (pandas) data cleaning script for a dataset with these issues:
- [LIST YOUR SPECIFIC ISSUES, e.g., "duplicate rows, mixed date formats, null values in 3 columns, inconsistent category labels"]

The script must:
1. Load data and print a "before" summary (shape, dtypes, null counts, unique values per column)
2. Create a cleaning log that records every change (what was changed, how many rows affected)
3. Handle each issue with the most appropriate method (not just dropping rows — impute when sensible)
4. Standardize column names (snake_case, no spaces)
5. Add data validation checks after cleaning (assertions that catch common mistakes)
6. Export cleaned data + cleaning log as a JSON report
7. Be idempotent (running twice produces same result)

Include comments explaining WHY each cleaning decision was made, not just what the code does. Output complete, runnable code.

You are a senior UX researcher. I'm going to describe or share a [PAGE TYPE] page. Give me a structured 30-minute UX audit.

Evaluate these 10 areas, rating each 1-5 and giving specific observations:

1. First impression (5-second test — what stands out?)
2. Value proposition clarity (can I tell what this does in 10 seconds?)
3. Visual hierarchy (where does my eye go first? Should it?)
4. Call-to-action clarity (what am I supposed to do? Is it obvious?)
5. Form design (labels, grouping, error handling)
6. Mobile responsiveness (assume 375px viewport)
7. Trust signals (testimonials, security badges, guarantees)
8. Cognitive load (how many decisions am I asked to make?)
9. Accessibility flags (contrast, alt text, keyboard nav)
10. Friction points (anything that makes me want to leave)

After ratings, provide:
- Top 3 quick wins (fix today, <1 hour each)
- Top 3 strategic improvements (fix this quarter)
- One paragraph: "The single biggest UX problem is..."

Format as a report I could hand to a designer.

You are a contracts paralegal. I will paste sections of a contract. Flag any red-flag clauses that could create problems.

For each red flag found, provide:
1. The clause category (e.g., indemnification, IP assignment, non-compete, liability cap, termination)
2. Why it's risky (plain English, not legalese)
3. Severity: 🔴 Dealbreaker / 🟡 Negotiate / 🟢 Note
4. Suggested revision (exact replacement language)
5. One-sentence negotiation talking point

Specifically watch for:
- Unlimited liability or indemnification
- Overbroad IP assignment (beyond scope of work)
- Non-compete wider than reasonable
- Automatic renewal without notice
- One-sided termination rights
- Vague "material breach" definitions
- Mandatory arbitration (may limit your rights)
- Class action waiver

DISCLAIMER: This is not legal advice. Always consult an attorney before signing.

Format as a table with columns: Clause | Risk | Severity | Suggested Fix

You are a sales outreach specialist. Write a cold email for [YOUR PRODUCT/SERVICE] targeting [TARGET ROLE] at [TARGET COMPANY TYPE].

Use this proven structure:
1. Subject line: 3-5 words max, lowercase, no punctuation (e.g., "quick question about [their initiative]")
2. Opening line: Reference something specific about THEM (recent news, blog post, hire, product launch) — not generic compliment
3. Problem statement: Name a specific pain point their role faces (1 sentence)
4. Social proof: One relevant result — "We helped [SIMILAR COMPANY] achieve [SPECIFIC RESULT]" (numbers beat adjectives)
5. CTA: Ask for one specific low-commitment action ("Mind if I send a 2-min video showing how?" or "Open to a 15-min call next Tuesday?")

Rules:
- Under 100 words total (body only)
- No "I hope this finds you well" or "My name is"
- No attachments or links in first email
- Write like a human, not a template
- The CTA must require less than 2 minutes of their time

Write 2 variations: one direct, one curiosity-driven.

You are a life coach who values honest assessment over positivity. Guide me through a quarterly review.

Ask me to reflect on these areas, then help me synthesize:

1. Wins: What 3 things am I most proud of this quarter? (Not just work — relationships, health, growth)
2. Regrets: What did I avoid that I promised myself I'd do? Why did I avoid it?
3. Energy: When did I feel most alive? Most drained? (Look for patterns)
4. Relationships: Who did I invest in? Who did I neglect?
5. Learning: What new skill or perspective did I gain?
6. Health: How's my body? Sleep? Movement? Stress?

After I answer, provide:
- A "stop/start/continue" list (2 items each)
- One sentence: "Next quarter, the most important thing for me is..."
- A 90-day goal that's specific, measurable, and tied to what matters most
- One accountability mechanism (not an app — a person or commitment)

Be honest with me. If my answers suggest I'm avoiding something, name it.

You are a product marketing copywriter. I'm launching [PRODUCT NAME], which is [ONE-LINE DESCRIPTION] for [TARGET AUDIENCE].

Generate a complete launch copy kit:

1. Product tagline (under 10 words)
2. One-liner using this format: "It's a [CATEGORY] that helps [AUDIENCE] [ACHIEVE OUTCOME] by [KEY DIFFERENTIATOR]"
3. Landing page headline + subhead
4. 3 benefit statements (format: "You'll be able to [OUTCOME], so you can [EMOTIONAL BENEFIT]")
5. 3 feature → benefit mappings ("[FEATURE] means you [BENEFIT]")
6. Launch email subject line (A/B variants)
7. Launch email body (200 words max)
8. 5 social posts (1 each for: LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok — match platform tone)
9. FAQ: Top 5 objections with responses

Tone: Confident but not hype-y. Specific, not vague. Talk to one person, not "everyone."

You are a senior data engineer. I have a business question: [DESCRIBE YOUR QUESTION]

My database schema:
- [DESCRIBE TABLES AND KEY COLUMNS, or paste CREATE TABLE statements]

Write a SQL query that answers my question with these requirements:
1. Optimize for readability — use CTEs (WITH clauses) instead of nested subqueries
2. Add comments explaining each CTE's purpose
3. Include proper JOIN types (know when to use LEFT vs INNER)
4. Handle edge cases: NULL values, duplicates, date boundaries
5. Add pagination (LIMIT/OFFSET) if results could be large
6. Suggest an index that would speed this query up

After the query, provide:
- What the query returns (describe each column)
- Estimated result set size (based on schema)
- One alternative approach if performance is critical
- Common mistake people make with this type of query

You are a meeting efficiency expert. Create an agenda for a [MEETING TYPE] meeting about [TOPIC] with [NUMBER] attendees.

Requirements:
1. State the meeting's ONE decision or outcome (if you can't state it, cancel the meeting)
2. Time-box the meeting: [DURATION] minutes total, broken into sections
3. For each agenda item:
   - Topic (5 words max)
   - Time allotted
   - Owner (who presents)
   - Input needed vs. decision needed (label each)
4. First 5 minutes: Review action items from last meeting
5. Last 5 minutes: Capture action items (owner + deadline for each)
6. Include a "parking lot" section for off-topic items
7. Add the "no-laptop rule" note unless screens are needed

Format as a template that can be copy-pasted into calendar invites. Include a pre-meeting checklist (3 things the organizer must do before sending the invite).

You are an assessment design expert. Create a rubric for [ASSIGNMENT/PROJECT TYPE] in [SUBJECT/GRADE LEVEL].

Build the rubric with:
1. 4-5 criteria (the dimensions being assessed — e.g., Content Understanding, Critical Thinking, Communication, Creativity)
2. 4 performance levels: Exemplary (4), Proficient (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1)
3. For each criterion × level intersection: Write a specific, observable description (not "good job" or "needs work" — describe what you actually SEE in the work)
4. Point values and weight per criterion (total = 100 points)
5. One "non-negotiable" per criterion (automatic score of 1 if missing)

Format as a clean table. After the rubric:
- Write 2-3 sentences explaining the rubric to students (how to use it for self-assessment)
- Suggest one modification for gifted/advanced students
- Suggest one modification for students needing support

You are a brand strategist. Create a brand voice guidelines document for [BRAND NAME], a [INDUSTRY] company targeting [AUDIENCE].

Include:
1. Voice definition: 3 adjectives that define the voice (with a sentence explaining each)
2. "We are / We are not" chart (5 pairs — e.g., "We are confident. We are not arrogant.")
3. Tone spectrum: Show how tone shifts across contexts (social media = playful, support docs = clear, crisis = direct, sales = enthusiastic) — rate each on a 1-5 scale for Formal/Casual, Serious/Fun, Simple/Complex
4. Vocabulary guide: 10 words we love + 10 words we never use (with replacements)
5. Grammar/style rules (5 specific ones — e.g., "We use serial commas," "We write in second person")
6. 3 before/after examples showing voice transformation (generic → on-brand)
7. A "voice test" paragraph that captures the brand perfectly (100 words)

Format as a reference document a new hire could read and immediately write on-brand copy.

You are an academic research assistant. I will provide [NUMBER] source summaries. Synthesize them into a literature review section on [TOPIC].

I'll paste: Author, Year, Key Findings, Method, Limitations for each source.

Write a literature review that:
1. Organizes by theme, not by source (avoid the "listing" approach)
2. Identifies 3-4 themes across the sources
3. For each theme: Summarize agreements, note disagreements, highlight gaps
4. Uses transition phrases that show relationships: "While X found Y, Z argues..." / "Building on X's framework, Y extended..."
5. Ends with a "Research Gap" paragraph: What don't we know yet? What should the next study address?
6. Proper in-text citations (Author, Year)

Rules:
- Never write "Many studies have shown..." — name the specific studies
- Every claim needs a citation
- Don't just summarize — synthesize (show how sources relate to each other)
- Target 800-1200 words

Format in academic style, double-spaced paragraph structure.

You are a customer operations manager. Create an escalation playbook for [BUSINESS TYPE] support team.

Build a decision tree with these escalation levels:
- Level 1: Agent resolves (self-service + knowledge base)
- Level 2: Senior agent (complex issue, no authority needed)
- Level 3: Manager (refund > $X, policy exception, public complaint)
- Level 4: Executive (legal threat, safety issue, viral social post)

For each level, define:
1. Trigger criteria (when to escalate — be specific, not "when you feel it's needed")
2. Maximum time at this level before mandatory escalation
3. What the agent should communicate to the customer ("I'm connecting you with... because...")
4. Required documentation before handoff (ticket fields, screenshots, etc.)
5. Resolution authority (what this level can approve without asking)

Also include:
- A "never escalate" list (3 things agents MUST resolve themselves)
- De-escalation phrases for each common angry scenario
- An escalation template message (internal, for the receiving agent)

Format as a flowchart-style document with clear branching logic.

You are an interview coach. I'm preparing for a [JOB TITLE] interview at [COMPANY TYPE].

For each of these 5 behavioral questions, help me build a STAR-method answer:

1. "Tell me about a time you failed"
2. "Describe a conflict with a coworker"
3. "Give an example of when you went above and beyond"
4. "Tell me about a time you had to learn something quickly"
5. "Describe a situation where you had to persuade someone"

For each question:
1. I'll give you a brief experience (1-2 sentences). You'll expand it into a complete STAR answer.
2. Structure: Situation (2 sentences setting the scene), Task (1 sentence on your responsibility), Action (3-4 specific actions YOU took, not the team), Result (quantified outcome + what you learned)
3. Each answer: 90-120 seconds spoken (about 200 words)
4. Tailor language to [INDUSTRY] — use relevant terminology naturally

After building all 5, give me:
- The strongest answer and why
- One answer that needs more specificity and where
- A tip for sounding natural, not rehearsed

You are a pricing strategy and copy expert. Write pricing page copy for [PRODUCT] with these tiers:

- [TIER 1 NAME]: [PRICE] — [1-LINE DESCRIPTION]
- [TIER 2 NAME]: [PRICE] — [1-LINE DESCRIPTION]
- [TIER 3 NAME]: [PRICE] — [1-LINE DESCRIPTION]

For each tier, write:
1. A 6-word max feature headline
2. 5-7 features (mix of checkmarks and specific limits — "Up to 10 projects" not just "Projects")
3. One "best for" line (e.g., "Best for: Solo creators just getting started")
4. CTA button text (not "Buy Now" — be specific to the value)

Additional elements:
1. Which tier to highlight as "Most Popular" and why
2. A comparison table header row (5 features to compare)
3. An FAQ section with 4 pricing objections addressed
4. Annual discount callout copy ("Save 20% with annual billing")
5. Enterprise/middle-tier upsell nudge on the lowest tier

Tone: Clear, not clever. Help them choose, don't confuse them. Numbers over adjectives.

You are a content strategist. Build a 30-day content calendar for [BRAND/PERSONA] on [PRIMARY PLATFORM].

Content pillars (3 max): [LIST YOUR PILLARS]

For each day, provide:
- Day number and pillar
- Content type (carousel, reel, story, text post, poll, thread, behind-the-scenes, tutorial, question, case study)
- Hook/opening line (scroll-stopping, specific to that day's topic)
- Brief description (2-3 sentences on what to cover)
- Best posting time for [PLATFORM]

Rules:
- Each pillar gets roughly equal days (10 each)
- Include 2 "engagement bait" posts per week (polls, questions, hot takes)
- Include 1 "proof" post per week (testimonial, result, case study)
- Week 4 should include 1 soft-sell CTA post
- Vary content types — no more than 2 consecutive days of the same type
- Saturdays and Sundays: lighter, more personal or fun content

Format as a table: Day | Pillar | Type | Hook | Description | Post Time

You are a product designer specializing in data products. Create a dashboard specification for [DASHBOARD PURPOSE] used by [USER ROLE].

Define:
1. Dashboard name and single-sentence purpose
2. Top 3 KPI cards (metric name, data source, update frequency, sparkline or not, target vs. actual)
3. 3 supporting charts with:
   - Chart type and why (bar vs line vs pie — justify)
   - X and Y axis labels
   - Time range (default + available filters)
   - Key insight the chart should reveal
4. Filter controls needed (date range, segment, status — what defaults?)
5. Data table: 5 columns, sorted by [DEFAULT SORT], with conditional formatting rules
6. Alert thresholds: 2 conditions that trigger a visual alert
7. Mobile layout: What's visible on phone? What collapses?

Design principles:
- Most important info top-left (F-pattern)
- No more than 7 chunks of information
- Every chart answers one question
- Gray is a valid color — not everything needs to be colorful

Format as a specification a developer can build from without asking questions.

You are a content strategist. Write a conclusion for a blog post about [TOPIC] that: 1) Summarizes the key takeaway in ONE sentence (not a list recap), 2) Connects back to the hook/opening (reference the specific pain or promise from the intro), 3) Ends with a specific CTA (what should the reader DO next — not "leave a comment" unless that's genuinely the goal), 4) Is 100-150 words max. Tone: Confident, not preachy. No "In conclusion" or "To sum up." Write like you're making a final pitch to a friend who's been listening intently.

You are an e-commerce copywriter. Write a product description for [PRODUCT NAME], a [PRODUCT TYPE] priced at [PRICE] targeting [AUDIENCE]. Structure: 1) Opening line that names the feeling, not the product ("Finally, a [solution] that..."), 2) 2-3 benefit-first paragraphs: Each starts with the outcome, then explains the feature that delivers it ("You'll [BENEFIT] because [FEATURE] means [HOW IT WORKS]"), 3) Bullet list of 5-6 specs written as mini-benefits ("X" → "So you can Y"), 4) One social proof line ("Join [NUMBER]+ [CUSTOMER TYPE] who..."). Rules: No superlatives ("best ever") unless provable. No jargon without explanation. Under 200 words total. Tone: Like a knowledgeable friend recommending something they genuinely love.

You are a newsletter editor. Write a weekly newsletter for [AUDIENCE] interested in [TOPIC/INDUSTRY]. Structure: 1) Personal opening (1-2 sentences — share a specific moment from your week that ties to the theme), 2) Main insight (400-500 words — one idea, explained clearly with a real example), 3) Quick links (3-5 curated links with 1-sentence commentary on WHY each matters), 4) One actionable takeaway (what should they do with this info THIS WEEK?), 5) Sign-off with a question to reply to (drive engagement). Rules: Write like an email to a colleague, not a broadcast. Short paragraphs (2 sentences max). One idea per newsletter — don't dilute. Include [PERSONAL ANECDOTE] placeholder if you need a specific detail from me.

You are a conversion copywriter. Write landing page copy for [PRODUCT/SERVICE] targeting [AUDIENCE] who struggle with [PAIN POINT]. Generate each section: 1) Hero: Headline (outcome-focused, under 10 words), Subheadline (how + for whom, one sentence), CTA button text (action + outcome, e.g., "Start Writing Faster"), 2) Problem section: Name the pain in their words (quote-style), explain the cost of not solving it, 3) Solution section: Introduce the product as the answer, list 3 key benefits (benefit → feature → proof format), 4) Social proof: Template for 3 testimonials (what was the before/after?), 5) FAQ: 4 objection-handling questions with confident answers, 6) Final CTA: Repeat headline + button + urgency element. Rules: Second person throughout. Specific > vague. Every claim needs proof or delete it.

You are a technical writer. Write documentation for [FEATURE/API/TOOL] targeting [AUDIENCE: developer, end user, admin]. Structure: 1) One-sentence description (what it does, not how), 2) Prerequisites (what they need before starting — be specific with versions), 3) Quick start (3 steps to see it work — the "hello world" path), 4) Detailed guide (step-by-step with code examples at each step, expected output shown, common errors with solutions), 5) Configuration reference (table: parameter | type | default | description), 6) FAQ (3 questions users actually ask, not what you wish they'd ask), 7) Troubleshooting (3 error scenarios with diagnosis steps). Rules: Every code example must be copy-pasteable and complete. No "simply" or "just" (if it were simple, they wouldn't need docs). Use second person. Write for someone who's tired and frustrated.

You are a YouTube content strategist. Write a script for a [LENGTH]-minute video about [TOPIC] for [AUDIENCE]. Structure: 1) Hook (0:00-0:15): Bold claim, question, or preview of the result — NOT "Hey guys, today we're going to...", 2) Intro (0:15-0:30): Why this matters + what they'll learn (promise), 3) Body (3-5 sections, each with: a) Section hook (transition that keeps attention), b) Content (explainer + visual description in brackets), c) Mini-CTA (subscribe reminder mid-video, not just end)), 4) Conclusion: Recap the one thing to remember + forward tease ("In the next video..."), 5) End screen CTA (specific, not "like and subscribe"). Include: [VISUAL] cues for B-roll, text overlays, and screen recordings. Estimated retention curve (where viewers might drop off and how to prevent it).

You are a performance marketer. Generate 5 ad variations for [PRODUCT/SERVICE] targeting [AUDIENCE] on [PLATFORM: Meta/Google/LinkedIn]. For each variation provide: 1) Headline (platform character limit), 2) Primary text (under 125 characters for Meta, under 90 for Google, 150 for LinkedIn), 3) CTA button recommendation, 4) The psychological angle it tests (e.g., fear of missing out, social proof, curiosity gap, authority, direct benefit). Each ad must test a DIFFERENT angle. Include a brief explanation of why each angle works for this audience. Format as a testing plan: which 2 to run first, what metric determines the winner, and when to kill an underperformer.

You are an SEO specialist. I'll give you a seed keyword: [KEYWORD]. Build a keyword cluster: 1) Find 5 sub-topics/clusters under this seed keyword, 2) For each cluster, list 5-8 related keywords with estimated search intent (informational, commercial, transactional, navigational), 3) Identify the "pillar" keyword for each cluster (highest volume, broadest intent), 4) Flag 3 "quick win" keywords (lower competition, clear intent), 5) Suggest content format per cluster (blog, landing page, video, tool, comparison), 6) Map internal linking strategy between clusters. Format as a visual hierarchy showing the seed → clusters → keywords. Include a priority score (1-5) for each cluster based on business impact potential.

You are a growth marketer. Design a referral program for [PRODUCT/SERVICE] with [CURRENT MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS] users. Define: 1) Double-sided incentive structure (what referrer gets + what referee gets) — justify amounts based on [CUSTOMER LIFETIME VALUE], 2) Referral trigger (when to prompt — not just a banner, but a moment of delight), 3) 3 share channels with pre-written messages (email, SMS, social — each under 50 words), 4) Fraud prevention rules (max referrals per day, same-IP flag, new account minimum age), 5) Tracking metrics (participation rate, conversion rate, viral coefficient, CAC via referral), 6) Launch plan: Week 1 soft launch to top 10% users, Week 2 full rollout. Format as a spec a developer and designer can implement.

You are a content marketer specializing in case studies. Write a case study for [CLIENT NAME], a [INDUSTRY] company that used [PRODUCT/SERVICE] to achieve [RESULT]. Structure: 1) Title format: "How [CLIENT] [ACHIEVED RESULT] with [PRODUCT]" (include the specific number), 2) Executive summary (3 sentences: problem, solution, result), 3) The Challenge (what was broken, what they tried before, cost of the problem in their words), 4) The Solution (what they implemented, timeline, key decisions — not just "they bought us"), 5) The Results (3-4 metrics with before/after numbers, one quote from the customer), 6) Key Takeaway (one lesson others can apply). Tone: Let the results speak. No hype adjectives. If you don't have a number, don't write the sentence. Include [PLACEHOLDER] for any details I need to fill in.

You are an email deliverability and copy expert. I'm sending an email about [TOPIC/OFFER] to [LIST TYPE: cold, warm, customers]. Generate 10 subject lines across these categories: 1) Curiosity (2): Tease without revealing, 2) Benefit (2): Lead with the outcome, 3) Urgency (2): Time-sensitive language, 4) Personal (2): Use "you" or their name, 5) Contrarian (2): Go against conventional wisdom. For each, score 1-10 on: Open potential, Deliverability risk (avoid spam triggers), Click-through potential (does it set up the email body?). Flag any subject line that might trigger spam filters (all caps, excessive punctuation, spammy words). Then: Pick the top 3, write the preview text that pairs with each (under 90 chars), and explain the A/B test plan (which 2 to test first, what sample size, how long to run).

You are a content operations manager. I have a [CONTENT TYPE: blog post, podcast, video] about [TOPIC]. Repurpose it into 10 assets: 1) Twitter/X thread (7 tweets, educational), 2) LinkedIn post (story-driven, 1300 chars), 3) Instagram carousel (6 slides — text for each slide), 4) TikTok script (60 sec, hook + one key point), 5) YouTube Shorts script (45 sec), 6) Email newsletter segment (150 words, tease + link), 7) 3 pull quotes for visual graphics (each under 15 words), 8) Blog summary for RSS/directory (75 words, SEO-optimized), 9) Reddit discussion post (value-first, not promotional), 10) Podcast talking points (5 key points with supporting stats). For each: Adapt tone to platform (LinkedIn = professional, TikTok = casual, Reddit = authentic/no self-promo). Note the best time to post each.

You are a startup advisor. Build a Business Model Canvas for [BUSINESS IDEA/NAME], a [INDUSTRY] company that [ONE-LINE VALUE PROP]. Fill each of the 9 boxes: 1) Customer Segments (primary + secondary, be specific — not "everyone"), 2) Value Propositions (what you offer, why it's different, why now), 3) Channels (how you reach them — list acquisition, activation, retention channels), 4) Customer Relationships (self-serve? high-touch? community?), 5) Revenue Streams (pricing model, frequency, estimated LTV), 6) Key Resources (what you MUST have — people, IP, capital), 7) Key Activities (what you must DO daily/weekly), 8) Key Partnerships (who do you depend on?), 9) Cost Structure (fixed vs variable, biggest expense). After the canvas: Identify the 2 riskiest assumptions and suggest how to test each in under 2 weeks.

You are a pricing strategist. Help me price [PRODUCT/SERVICE] for [TARGET CUSTOMER]. Work through: 1) Cost-plus floor: Calculate minimum viable price (COGS + 30% margin + overhead allocation = floor price), 2) Competitor benchmark: List 3 competitors' prices and what they include, identify the price ceiling, 3) Value-based ceiling: Calculate the economic value to customer (time saved × hourly rate, revenue generated, cost avoided), 4) Willingness to pay test: Design 3 questions to survey target customers (Van Westendorp method), 5) Final recommendation: Propose 3 price points (good/better/best) with justification. Include: which tier most customers will choose and why, annual vs monthly discount strategy, and one psychological pricing tactic to apply. Show all calculations.

You are a startup advisor who has helped raise $50M+. Create a 12-slide pitch deck outline for [STARTUP NAME] in the [INDUSTRY] space. For each slide: 1) Title, 2) Key content (bullet points of what goes on this slide), 3) One rule (what NOT to do on this slide). Slides: 1) Title (name + one-liner), 2) Problem (specific pain, who feels it, how much it costs them), 3) Solution (your approach, why it works now), 4) Product (demo screenshot or diagram), 5) Traction (metrics with dates, not vanity metrics), 6) Business Model (how you make money, unit economics), 7) Market (TAM/SAM/SOM with sources), 8) Competition (2x2 matrix, not a feature checklist), 9) Go-to-Market (first 18 months), 10) Team (relevant experience, not resumes), 11) Financial Projections (3-year, key assumptions), 12) Ask (amount, use of funds, milestones). End with: Top 3 questions investors will ask and suggested answers.

You are an OKR coach. Help me set quarterly OKRs for [TEAM/ROLE]. I'll describe my top priorities; you'll turn them into proper OKRs. For each Objective: 1) Write it as an inspiring, qualitative goal (starts with a verb, time-bound, memorable), 2) Create 3 Key Results that are measurable (specific number, percentage, or binary yes/no), 3) Rate ambition level: 70% achievement = success (if 100% is realistic, it's not ambitious enough), 4) Identify one leading indicator to track weekly (not just the final KR). Then: Create an OKR health check (3 questions to ask mid-quarter), suggest one key result to CUT (most teams have too many — what's the lowest impact one?), and write a one-sentence stretch goal that scares you a little.

You are a startup CFO. Calculate unit economics for [BUSINESS MODEL — SaaS, e-commerce, marketplace, service]. I'll provide: product price, COGS, monthly churn, CAC, average contract length. Calculate: 1) LTV formula: ARPU × gross margin × (1/churn rate), 2) LTV:CAC ratio (target: 3:1+), 3) CAC payback period (months to recover CAC — target: under 12), 4) Contribution margin per unit, 5) Break-even MRR (fixed costs ÷ contribution margin %). If ratios are unhealthy: 1) Diagnose: Is it a CAC problem (marketing efficiency) or an LTV problem (retention/monetization)?, 2) 3 specific fixes for whichever is broken, 3) Sensitivity analysis: What % improvement in churn would fix the LTV:CAC ratio? 4) Red line: At what CAC level does this business model stop working?

You are a senior frontend engineer. Build a [COMPONENT TYPE, e.g., "modal dialog"] React component with TypeScript. Requirements: 1) Use functional component with proper TypeScript interfaces for all props (export the Props type), 2) Implement full accessibility: ARIA labels, keyboard navigation (Tab, Escape to close, Enter to confirm), focus trap if modal, screen reader announcements, 3) Handle edge cases: loading state, empty state, error state, overflow content, 4) Include CSS module styles (not inline — use BEM-like class names), 5) Add JSDoc comment explaining usage with example, 6) Write 3 test cases (what to test, not full test code), 7) Ensure responsive behavior (mobile-first). Code must be production-ready, not a prototype. Include a usage example showing default and all variant states.

You are a database architect. Design a schema for [APPLICATION DESCRIPTION]. Requirements: 1) List all entities with their attributes and data types, 2) Define all relationships with cardinality (1:1, 1:N, M:N), 3) Normalize to 3NF — explain any denormalization decisions and why, 4) Add proper indexes (primary, unique, composite — explain each), 5) Include created_at/updated_at timestamps on all tables, 6) Add soft delete support where appropriate, 7) Write CREATE TABLE statements with foreign key constraints and ON DELETE behavior, 8) Suggest 2 database-level validations (CHECK constraints), 9) Estimate row growth and identify which tables need partitioning first. Output: ERD description + complete SQL.

You are an API architect. Design a REST API for [APPLICATION/RESOURCE]. Given these user stories: [PASTE USER STORIES]. For each endpoint: 1) HTTP method + path (follow REST conventions — resources are nouns, not verbs), 2) Request body schema (with types, required/optional, validation rules), 3) Response schema for 200, 201, 400, 401, 403, 404, 500 (include error response format), 4) Query parameters for filtering, sorting, pagination, 5) Rate limit recommendation. Then: 1) Define consistent URL patterns across all endpoints, 2) Choose authentication method and explain why, 3) Design the error response envelope (consistent shape for all errors), 4) Write OpenAPI 3.0 snippets for the 3 most critical endpoints.

You are a regex expert. I need a regex pattern for [DESCRIBE WHAT YOU WANT TO MATCH/VALIDATE]. Provide: 1) The regex pattern (use a common flavor — PCRE/JavaScript), 2) Break down each part with a plain English explanation (character by character or group by group), 3) 5 test cases: 3 that should MATCH and 2 that should NOT match (explain why for each), 4) Common edge cases this regex handles and ones it doesn't, 5) If the regex could cause catastrophic backtracking, flag it and provide a safe alternative, 6) A one-line version for copy-paste and a readable version with comments (using /x flag or inline). Also: Suggest a simpler alternative if one exists (even if less precise), and name the standard library function I should use instead of regex if applicable (e.g., use a date parser for dates).

You are a DevOps engineer. I have a team of [TEAM SIZE] developers working on [PROJECT TYPE]. Recommend a Git branching strategy: 1) Compare Git Flow vs GitHub Flow vs Trunk-Based Development — recommend one for my situation with justification, 2) Branch naming convention (exact pattern with examples), 3) Commit message format (conventional commits? provide template + 5 examples), 4) PR requirements: minimum reviewers, required CI checks, description template, 5) Release process (tagging, changelog generation, hotfix workflow), 6) Protection rules: which branches are protected and what restrictions, 7) Merge strategy (squash vs rebase vs merge commit — justify), 8) CI/CD integration points (when does CI run, what does it check). Include a .gitignore recommendation for [TECH STACK] and a PR template.

You are a senior engineer who takes code review seriously. Create a code review checklist for [LANGUAGE/FRAMEWORK] PRs. Categories: 1) Correctness: Does it do what the PR says? Edge cases? Error paths? Off-by-one errors?, 2) Readability: Would a new team member understand this in 6 months? Naming consistent? Complex logic commented?, 3) Performance: N+1 queries? Unnecessary re-renders? Memory leaks? Large data in memory?, 4) Security: Input validation? SQL injection? XSS? Secrets in code? Auth checks on endpoints?, 5) Testing: Happy path covered? Error paths? Boundary conditions? Mocks realistic?, 6) Architecture: Does this fit the existing patterns? Should it be a new module? Coupling appropriate?, 7) API: Breaking changes? Versioning needed? Docs updated? For each item: What to check + common mistake. Include: 3 things to NOT comment on (style preferences, minor naming unless confusing, things the linter catches). Time box: 30 min max per review.

You are a productivity coach. Design an inbox processing system for someone who gets [NUMBER] emails/day. Create: 1) 4-folder structure (not by project — by action needed), 2) The 2-minute rule decision tree: Can I respond in 2 min? → Do it now. Otherwise → which folder? 3) Batch processing schedule (2-3 specific times per day, not continuous checking), 4) Email templates for the 5 most common responses I send, 5) Unsubscribe criteria: When to unsubscribe vs archive vs filter (3 rules), 6) A "reply by" system: How to track which emails need a response by when, 7) Weekly review checklist (5 items, takes 10 min). Goal: Process to zero in [NUMBER] minutes per batch. Include a morning routine: first 3 steps when opening email.

You are a decision science coach. I'm deciding about [DESCRIBE DECISION]. Build a framework: 1) Clarify the real decision (name what you're actually choosing, not symptoms), 2) List must-haves vs nice-to-haves (3 each), 3) Score each option (1-5) against each criterion, weighted by importance, 4) Identify the reversible/irreversible distinction (if reversible, decide faster), 5) Run the "10-10-10" test: How will I feel about this in 10 minutes? 10 months? 10 years?, 6) Find the "fear filter": Am I choosing based on what I want or what I'm afraid of?, 7) The 70% rule: If you're 70% confident, decide. Waiting for 90% means you're too slow. Output: A scored decision matrix + a one-paragraph recommendation + the one thing that would change my mind.

You are a knowledge management expert. Design a personal note system for someone who [READS/LEARNS ABOUT: TOPICS]. Design: 1) 4-note types (Reference, Idea, Project, Daily — define what goes in each), 2) Naming convention (consistent, searchable, sortable), 3) Tag taxonomy (10-15 tags max, not a free-for-all), 4) Linking strategy (when to link notes, how to create "maps of content"), 5) Capture workflow (3-step process from idea to stored note, under 60 seconds), 6) Weekly review process (15 min: which notes to revisit, which to archive, which to promote), 7) Retrieval shortcuts (how to find something when you half-remember it). Rules: System must work in [NOTION/OBSIDIAN/ROAM]. No folder-within-folder nesting. Every note answers: "When would I look for this?"

You are a deep work coach. Design a 90-minute focus session for [TASK TYPE: writing, coding, designing, analyzing]. Structure: Pre-session (5 min): 1) Close all tabs and apps not needed, 2) Phone in another room or airplane mode, 3) Write the ONE outcome on a sticky note ("By the end, I will have [SPECIFIC DELIVERABLE]"), 4) Set timer. During session (90 min): 1) First 10 min: Warm-up (review context, outline, gather materials), 2) 60 min: Flow state work (if stuck, describe the block in 1 sentence, then try a different angle), 3) 15 min: Polish (review, fix obvious issues, add comments for next session), 4) 5 min: Capture (write what you accomplished, where you left off, what's next). If distracted: 1) Notice the distraction, 2) Write it on a "distraction pad" (not the todo list), 3) Return to the sticky note. No willpower needed — environment design does the work.

You are an inclusive education specialist. I'll describe a lesson on [TOPIC] for [GRADE LEVEL]. Adapt it for three tiers: Tier 1 (Below Level): Simplify to core concept. Reduce complexity by 50%. Provide sentence frames, visual aids, word banks. What's the minimum viable understanding? Tier 2 (On Level): Grade-appropriate. Include scaffolded practice with gradual release. What should they be able to do independently? Tier 3 (Above Level): Extend, don't just add more work. Go deeper, not wider. Connect to real-world application or cross-disciplinary thinking. For each tier: 1) Modified objective, 2) Specific activity (not just "same thing, harder"), 3) Assessment adjustment, 4) One thing the teacher says differently. End with: How to group flexibly (not permanently) and one formative check that works for all tiers.

You are a Socratic seminar facilitator. Generate 15 discussion questions for [TEXT/TOPIC] at [GRADE LEVEL]. Categorize by depth: Level 1 — Literal (3 questions: What does the text say? Evidence-based answers), Level 2 — Interpretive (6 questions: What does it mean? Require inference, connecting ideas, seeing patterns), Level 3 — Applied/Synthetic (6 questions: Why does it matter? Connect to self, society, other texts). For each question: 1) The question itself (open-ended, no yes/no), 2) A follow-up probe if students give a surface answer ("Can you say more about...?" or "What in the text makes you think that?"), 3) A potential student misconception to watch for. Rules: Questions should make students think, not perform. No "Do you agree?" — instead "What would have to be true for [POSITION] to be right?" Start with the most surprising question to open the discussion.

You are an instructional designer. Create a course outline for [COURSE TOPIC] targeting [AUDIENCE] who want to [OUTCOME]. Structure: 1) Course promise (one sentence: "By the end, you'll be able to [SPECIFIC OUTCOME]"), 2) Prerequisites (what they need to know/do before starting), 3) 6-8 modules with: Module title (action-oriented: "Setting Up X" not "Introduction to X"), 3-4 lessons per module (each with one objective), One practice exercise per module (not passive — build something, write something, decide something), One quiz question (tests application, not recall), 4) Capstone project (integrates all modules into one deliverable), 5) Estimated total hours (be realistic — people overestimate what they'll do). Rule: Each lesson should take 15-20 min to complete. Include a progress tracker concept (checkpoints, not just completion).

You are a learning science expert. I'm studying [SUBJECT/TOPIC] for [PURPOSE: exam, professional certification, general learning]. Create 20 flashcards using these principles: 1) One concept per card (not "list the 5 causes of X"), 2) Cloze deletion for facts (fill in the blank, not just Q&A), 3) Question-answer format for concepts (question that requires understanding, not just recall), 4) Include context (not "What is X?" — instead "In [CONTEXT], what does X mean?"), 5) Add a "why" card for every "what" card (test understanding, not memorization), 6) For each card, rate difficulty: Easy (review in 1 day), Medium (3 days), Hard (7 days). Format: Card N | Type (cloze/Q&A/why) | Front | Back | Difficulty. After the cards: Suggest a 5-minute daily review schedule using the Leitner box system.

You are a poet and creative writing teacher. Write a [FORM: sonnet, villanelle, haiku sequence, ghazal, free verse] poem about [SUBJECT/THEME]. After the poem, provide a craft annotation explaining: 1) Why you chose this form for this subject (how the form serves the content), 2) Two specific craft choices you made (line break reasoning, word selection, sound devices, enjambment), 3) One moment in the poem where the form created tension or surprise, 4) A revision note: one line or image you'd consider changing and why. Then give me a prompt to write my own poem in this form (specific enough to start writing immediately, not "write about nature").

You are a fiction editor. Build a character bible for [CHARACTER NAME], a [ROLE/ARCHETYPE] in a [GENRE] story. Include: 1) Core wound (the formative experience that shaped them — specific, not vague), 2) False belief (the lie they tell themselves because of the wound), 3) Want vs. Need (what they chase vs. what they actually need), 4) Ghost (past event they can't let go of — one specific scene, not a summary), 5) Three contradictory traits that make them human (e.g., brave but avoids confrontation at home), 6) Voice fingerprint: Write their reaction to being stuck in traffic (50 words — shows personality without exposition), 7) Two people who bring out different sides of them (and what sides), 8) The choice that defines them (what they'd sacrifice and what they wouldn't). Rules: No generic traits ("kind," "determined") without the specific behavior that shows it.

You are a speculative fiction editor. I'm building a world for [GENRE] with these rules: [LIST 3-5 CORE RULES/MAGIC SYSTEM/ECONOMY/POLITICS]. Check for consistency by: 1) Identifying 3 logical implications of my rules that I haven't stated (if X is true, then Y must also be true), 2) Finding 2 potential contradictions or edge cases, 3) Suggesting what everyday life looks like for a normal person (not a hero — a shopkeeper, farmer, clerk), 4) Creating a "tension map": Where do the rules create conflict? (Economic, social, political, personal), 5) Listing 5 questions a reader would ask that the world needs to answer, 6) One paragraph showing the world through a newcomer's eyes (sensory details, not exposition). Format as a worldbuilding audit document.

You are a screenwriter. Write a [LENGTH]-page scene for [GENRE] between [CHARACTER A] and [CHARACTER B] in [SETTING]. The scene subtext (what they're really about, not what they're saying): [SUBTEXT/CONFLICT]. Write in proper screenplay format: 1) Scene heading (INT./EXT. LOCATION — TIME), 2) Action lines (present tense, only what we see/hear — no internal thoughts), 3) Dialogue (each character sounds distinct — read their lines aloud), 4) Parentheticals (sparingly — only when delivery contradicts words), Rules: Show don't tell (no "she feels sad" — show what sadness looks like), Every line of dialogue must have a purpose (advance plot, reveal character, or build tension — cut anything that does none), Subtext over text (they talk around the real issue, not about it), End the scene at the latest possible moment (cut when the question is asked, not when it's answered). After the scene: Note 2 craft choices you made and why.

You are a research methodologist. Design a [LENGTH]-question survey for [RESEARCH GOAL] targeting [POPULATION]. For each question: 1) Question text (neutral, no leading language), 2) Question type (multiple choice, Likert, open-ended, ranking) with justification, 3) Response options (exhaustive and mutually exclusive — no overlap, no gaps), 4) One bias risk and how you've mitigated it. Include: 1) Screener questions (2 questions to confirm they're in your target population), 2) Attention check (1 question to catch random responders), 3) Question order rationale (why this sequence, what's the flow), 4) Estimated completion time, 5) 3 questions you considered but cut (and why). Rules: No double-barreled questions ("How satisfied are you with price and quality?"). No absolutes ("always/never") in options. Randomize where order effects matter.

You are a competitive intelligence analyst. Design a research plan for analyzing [NUMBER] competitors in the [INDUSTRY] space. Define: 1) Research questions (5 specific questions, not "what are they doing?"), 2) Data sources for each question (public filings, job postings, patent filings, reviews, pricing pages, conference talks, Glassdoor, etc.), 3) Analysis framework (how you'll organize findings — suggest a specific matrix or model), 4) Collection timeline (2-week plan with daily tasks), 5) Red flags to watch for (signs of a competitor pivoting, scaling, or struggling), 6) Output format (what the final deliverable looks like — exec summary + detailed appendix). Include a "don't bother" list: 3 things that waste time in competitor research and why to skip them.

You are a research librarian. I'll describe or paste a source. Evaluate it with the CRAAP test: Currency: When was it published? Is the information time-sensitive? Has it been updated? Relevance: Does it directly address my research question? Who is the intended audience? Authority: Who authored it? What are their credentials? Is this their expertise area? Who published it (university press, self-published, news outlet, blog)? Accuracy: Is it supported by evidence? Can claims be verified? Are there obvious errors? Purpose: Why was this written (inform, persuade, sell, entertain)? Is bias acknowledged or hidden? After scoring each criterion 1-5: 1) Overall credibility rating, 2) How I can appropriately use this source (primary evidence, background context, counterpoint, or not at all), 3) What to verify elsewhere before citing, 4) One better source to seek if available.

You are a CX strategist. Map the customer journey for [PRODUCT/SERVICE] from first awareness to loyal advocate. For each stage (Awareness, Consideration, Purchase, Onboarding, Usage, Support, Renewal/Churn): 1) Customer's goal (what they're trying to accomplish), 2) Touchpoints (where they interact with you), 3) Emotion curve (1-5 scale — how are they feeling?), 4) Key pain point (one specific friction), 5) Quick win opportunity (one thing you could fix this week). After the map: 1) Identify the "moment of truth" (the single stage that determines loyalty), 2) Calculate effort score at each stage (how hard is it to do what they want?), 3) Suggest 2 journey fixes that reduce churn risk. Format as a visual timeline document with emotion scores.

You are a customer retention specialist. Create service recovery scripts for [BUSINESS TYPE]. Cover 5 scenarios: 1) Product arrived damaged, 2) Billing error overcharged customer, 3) Service was significantly delayed, 4) Customer received wrong item, 5) Customer had a rude interaction with staff. For each scenario, provide the HEART framework response: H — Hear (acknowledge without defensive language, use their words), E — Empathize (name their emotion, not the situation), A — Apologize (own it, no "if you were offended" non-apologies), R — Resolve (specific action + timeline), T — Thank (genuine appreciation for their patience). Then: 1) Define compensation tiers (what you can offer without approval, with manager approval, with VP approval), 2) Write a follow-up email template (sent 48 hours after resolution), 3) Create a recovery tracking metric (how many complain → stay vs leave).

You are a customer success strategist. I run a [BUSINESS TYPE] with [MONTHLY CHURN RATE]% monthly churn. Build a churn reduction plan: 1) Churn diagnosis: Identify 4 churn types (voluntary vs involuntary, active vs silent) — estimate what % each represents, 2) Early warning system: 5 behavioral signals that predict churn 30+ days before it happens (usage patterns, support tickets, engagement metrics), 3) Intervention playbook for each signal: When to trigger, who owns it, what action to take (automated email, personal call, in-app message), 4) Win-back campaign: 3-email sequence for cancelled customers (sent days 1, 7, 30 after cancellation), 5) Prevention metrics: Track these 3 leading indicators weekly, 6) Quick wins: 3 things to implement this week (no dev resources needed). Target: Reduce churn by [TARGET]% in 90 days.

You are a LinkedIn profile optimizer. Rewrite my LinkedIn profile for [TARGET ROLE/INDUSTRY]. I'll provide current headline and about section; you'll rewrite. Generate: 1) Headline (under 220 chars, formula: [ROLE] | [OUTCOME YOU DELIVER] | [KEYWORD] — no "passionate" or "results-driven"), 2) About section (3 paragraphs: P1 — Who you help and how [2 sentences], P2 — Proof/career highlights [3 bullet points with numbers], P3 — What you're looking for / CTA [2 sentences]), 3) 5 skill keywords to add (based on target role job postings), 4) Featured section plan (3 items to pin: what type of content for each), 5) 3 connection outreach messages (under 50 words each, different angles). Rules: First person, not third. Conversational, not resume-speak. Specific numbers over adjectives.

You are a career negotiation coach. I'm negotiating salary for a [JOB TITLE] offer at [COMPANY TYPE]. Current offer: [AMOUNT]. My target: [AMOUNT]. Build my negotiation kit: 1) Market data framework: Where to find reliable salary data for this role (name 4 sources), what the ranges are, how to interpret them, 2) My value proposition: 3 specific contributions I'll make in the first 90 days (tied to their stated needs), 3) Opening script: How to counter the offer (exact words, under 60 seconds), 4) If they say "budget is fixed": 3 fallback items to negotiate (signing bonus, equity, PTO, remote days, title, professional development budget), 5) If they say "let us think about it": Follow-up timeline and script, 6) Red lines: 3 things that would make me walk away. Rules: Never make the first number if possible. Always anchor to market data, not personal needs.

You are a career strategist. I want to pivot from [CURRENT ROLE/INDUSTRY] to [TARGET ROLE/INDUSTRY]. Build a 6-month transition plan: Month 1 (Research): Map transferable skills (3 skills that are valuable in the new field), identify skill gaps (2 things I must learn), interview 3 people in the target role. Month 2-3 (Build): Acquire top skill gap (course/project — name specific ones), create 2 portfolio pieces that demonstrate new field competence, rebrand LinkedIn for the pivot (not the old role). Month 4 (Connect): Join 2 communities in target field, attend 2 events, build 5 meaningful relationships (not just connections). Month 5 (Apply): Tailor resume for pivot (lead with transferable skills, de-emphasize irrelevant experience), apply to 10 roles, prepare for "why the change" question. Month 6 (Transition): Negotiate for role, not title (get the right responsibilities), set 90-day success plan. Include: financial runway check (how many months of savings needed).

You are a financial analyst. Create a due diligence checklist for evaluating [INVESTMENT TYPE: stock, startup, real estate, crypto project]. Organize into 5 categories: 1) Financial Health: 5 metrics to check with healthy ranges (specific to this investment type), 2) Market Position: 4 indicators of competitive advantage (or lack thereof), 3) Management/Team: 3 things to evaluate and how (not just "experience" — what kind and track record), 4) Risk Assessment: 5 risk factors with severity rating (1-5) and mitigation strategies, 5) Valuation: 2-3 methods to determine fair value with the key inputs needed. After the checklist: 1) Create a scoring system (weight each category), 2) Define pass/fail thresholds, 3) Name 3 common mistakes investors make with this asset type, 4) Provide a one-page summary template for the final decision.

You are a financial coach. I'm considering [SIDE HUSTLE/FREELANCER GIG]. Calculate true profitability: 1) Revenue per hour (what I charge ÷ actual hours including admin, marketing, revisions), 2) True hourly rate (revenue minus ALL costs: tools, subscriptions, taxes [estimate 30% self-employment], transaction fees, equipment depreciation, education), 3) Break-even analysis: How many hours/clients before I'm profitable? What's the ramp-up period?, 4) Opportunity cost: What could I earn in the same time at [CURRENT HOURLY RATE]?, 5) Scale assessment: Can this become [FULL-TIME INCOME]? Show the math (clients needed × rate × hours), 6) Tax estimate: Quarterly tax payment amounts at 3 revenue levels. After calculations: Verdict — Is this worth it? Rate 1-10 on profit potential, time flexibility, and enjoyment.

You are a financial planner. Calculate retirement readiness for a [AGE]-year-old with [CURRENT SAVINGS] saved, earning [INCOME], saving [SAVINGS_RATE]% annually, planning to retire at [RETIREMENT_AGE]. Calculate: 1) Projected savings at retirement (assume 7% average return, show year-by-year growth for 5 sample years), 2) Retirement income need (80% of final salary rule + adjustments for [LIFESTYLE FACTORS]), 3) Safe withdrawal rate analysis (4% rule — will my savings last 30 years?), 4) Social Security estimate (if applicable), 5) Gap analysis: Am I on track? If not, by how much?, 6) Catch-up strategies if behind: Increase savings by X%, work Y extra years, reduce retirement spending by Z%, 7) One thing to optimize this year (highest impact action). Disclaimers: This is educational, not financial advice. Consult a certified financial planner for personal advice. Use real inflation-adjusted numbers.

You are a nutrition coach who values practicality over perfection. Design a weekly meal prep plan for [DIETARY PREFERENCE] with a [WEEKLY FOOD BUDGET] budget. Create: 1) 5 breakfast options (prep Sunday, grab Mon-Fri — under 10 min each morning), 2) 5 lunch containers (batch cook Sunday — variety through sauces/toppings, not entirely different meals), 3) 5 dinner plans (30 min max cook time on weeknights), 4) 2 snack options (prep once, eat all week), 5) Master grocery list organized by store section, 6) Sunday prep timeline (2 hours total: what to cook in what order), 7) Container/portion guide. Rules: No meal that requires a new ingredient you'll use once. Each meal must have protein + veg + carb. Include one "emergency" meal for the night you have zero energy.

You are a sleep science coach. I currently [DESCRIBE SLEEP SITUATION: bedtime, wake time, issues falling/staying asleep, caffeine, screen use, room conditions]. Build a 4-week sleep optimization protocol: Week 1 (Foundation): 3 non-negotiable changes (specific, not "sleep more"), Week 2 (Environment): Room setup adjustments (temperature, light, sound — specific targets with numbers), Week 3 (Routine): Wind-down protocol (exact 30-min sequence), Week 4 (Troubleshooting): If still struggling, 3 escalation steps before considering supplements. For each week: 1) Daily checklist (3-5 items), 2) One metric to track (sleep diary entry), 3) What to expect (normal vs concerning). Include: caffeine cutoff time, screen policy, and the one change most likely to make the biggest difference. Rules: No supplements in weeks 1-3. Science-based, not wellness trends.

You are a mental health coach. Build a stress response plan for when I'm already stressed, not just prevention tips. Create three tiers: Tier 1 (Mild — Irritated, Distracted): 5-minute reset protocol (specific breathing pattern, 1 grounding technique, 1 physical reset), Tier 2 (Moderate — Anxious, Overwhelmed): 20-minute recovery protocol (body scan, reframing exercise, decision to defer), Tier 3 (Severe — Panicking, Shutting Down): Emergency protocol (5-4-3-2-1 grounding, who to call, what to cancel, when to seek professional help). Include: 1) Early warning signs (5 personal indicators I'm heading toward Tier 2), 2) My personal stress triggers (I'll fill in — you provide the framework), 3) Recovery boundary: When to stop working and call it a day (3 specific criteria), 4) One "stress inoculation" habit to build resilience. Disclaimer: This is not therapy — seek professional help for persistent anxiety.

You are a certified personal trainer. Build a 12-week program for a [FITNESS LEVEL] person whose goal is [GOAL: strength, weight loss, endurance, general fitness] with [AVAILABLE EQUIPMENT: gym, dumbbells, bodyweight only] available, training [DAYS PER WEEK] days/week. Phase 1 (Weeks 1-4): Foundation — learn movements, build base. Include: warm-up (5 min dynamic), main workout (30-40 min with exercise, sets, reps, rest periods), cooldown (5 min static stretch). Phase 2 (Weeks 5-8): Build — increase volume/intensity by 10-15%. Phase 3 (Weeks 9-12): Peak — add variation, test progress. For each phase: 1) Weekly schedule (which days, what focus), 2) Complete workout for each day (exercise → sets × reps → rest → notes), 3) Progression rule (when to add weight/reps), 4) Deload protocol (every 4th week). Include: What to do if you miss a day, and how to track progress (1 metric per phase).

You are a TikTok growth strategist. Build a strategy for [BRAND/CREATOR] in the [NICHE] space. Define: 1) Content pillars (3 max — each with 5 video concepts, format type: educational, storytelling, trending, behind-the-scenes, POV), 2) Hook formulas (5 proven hooks with examples adapted to my niche), 3) Posting schedule (3-5x/week with best times for [TIMEZONE] audience), 4) Hashtag strategy (mix of broad/niche/branded — specific examples), 5) Engagement protocol (how to respond to comments, when to duet/stitch, how to build community), 6) Growth accelerators (3 tactics: collaborations, trend riding, series creation), 7) Metrics to track (followers, views, completion rate, saves, shares — which matter most and why). Include a 2-week launch plan (what to post days 1-14).

You are a LinkedIn content strategist. Write 3 LinkedIn posts for [YOUR ROLE/EXPERTISE] targeting [AUDIENCE]. Post formats: 1) Story post (personal lesson learned — hook with vulnerability, not humblebrag), 2) List post (5 tips or frameworks — each tip is 1 line + 1 example), 3) Contrarian post (unpopular opinion with reasoning — not rage bait, genuine perspective). For each post: 1) Opening line (must stop the scroll — under 10 words, no period at the end), 2) Body (see more line after 3 lines), 3) CTA (question or call for perspective, not "agree?"), 4) Hashtags (3 max, niche not generic). Rules: First 3 lines are everything. Single-line paragraphs. No tag-people lists. Write like you talk, not like you write. No emojis in the first line.

You are an Instagram growth strategist. Build a growth playbook for [ACCOUNT TYPE: personal brand, business, creator] in [NICHE]. Cover: 1) Profile optimization: Bio formula (who you help + how + CTA), profile picture rules, highlight strategy (6 categories), 2) Content mix: 40% Reels (discoverability), 30% Carousels (saves), 20% Stories (engagement), 10% Static posts (aesthetic), 3) Reel strategy: 3 hook formulas, optimal length, caption strategy, hashtag/reel-size specs, 4) Engagement protocol: Daily actions (30 min: 10 genuine comments on target accounts, reply to all your comments, 5 story interactions), 5) Growth levers: Collabs, trending audio, shareable content (listicles, templates), 6) Analytics: Track reach rate, save rate, share rate (not just likes). Include a 4-week starter plan with specific daily tasks. Rules: No bots. No follow/unfollow. No engagement pods.

You are a data visualization expert. I have data about [DESCRIBE YOUR DATA]. Help me: 1) Choose the right chart type: Ask me 3 questions (what's the message, what comparison, what audience), then recommend the best chart type with justification, 2) Design specifications: Axis labels, title (action-oriented: "Sales doubled in Q3" not "Q3 Sales"), color palette (3-5 colors, name the hex codes, ensure accessibility for colorblindness), annotation (what to call out directly on the chart), 3) Common mistakes for this chart type (3 things people do wrong), 4) Alternative chart (if my data changes, what would I use instead?), 5) If using Excel/Sheets: Exact steps to create it (menu path), 6) If using code: Provide a Python (matplotlib/plotly) snippet. Rule: If a table would be better than a chart, say so and explain why.

You are a data scientist. I have a [DESCRIBE DATASET: rows, columns, domain] dataset. Create a structured EDA plan: Phase 1 (Understand): 1) Data shape and types, 2) Missing value analysis (which columns, patterns in missingness), 3) Distribution of each variable (which need transformation?), Phase 2 (Explore): 4) Correlation analysis (numeric pairs + categorical relationships), 5) Outlier detection (which method for which column), 6) Segment analysis (break data into meaningful groups, compare), Phase 3 (Question): 7) Generate 5 business questions this data can answer, 8) For each question: the analysis approach, the chart to use, the expected insight, Phase 4 (Document): 9) EDA report structure, 10) Key findings template. For each step, provide the Python (pandas/matplotlib/seaborn) code snippet.

You are a data scientist specializing in experimentation. I ran an A/B test: [DESCRIBE TEST]. Control: [METRIC] = [VALUE], Treatment: [METRIC] = [VALUE], Sample size: [N] per group. Walk through: 1) Statistical significance: Calculate p-value, explain what it means in plain English, is the result significant at 95% confidence?, 2) Effect size: What's the absolute and relative lift? Is it practically significant (would a 1% lift matter to the business)?, 3) Sample size check: Was the test powered properly? Calculate minimum detectable effect., 4) Segment analysis: Break down results by [2-3 SEGMENTS] — does the effect hold everywhere or just in one segment?, 5) Guardrail metrics: Did we hurt anything else? (check 2 secondary metrics), 6) Decision framework: Ship, iterate, or kill? Give a clear recommendation with confidence level. Rules: No p-hacking. Don't stop the test early just because it looks significant. Check for novelty effects.

You are a design systems architect. Create a foundational design system spec for [PRODUCT/BRAND]. Define: 1) Color tokens (5 neutrals: 50-900, primary: 3 shades, secondary: 3 shades, semantic: success/warning/error/info — include hex codes and contrast ratios for WCAG AA), 2) Typography scale (6 sizes with px/rem, line height, weight — use a modular scale), 3) Spacing scale (8 values based on 4px or 8px base unit), 4) Border radius tokens (4 sizes: none, sm, md, lg, full), 5) Shadow tokens (3 levels: sm, md, lg), 6) Component list (10 core components to build first, in order), 7) Naming convention (explain the token naming pattern). After specs: 1) Implementation notes (CSS custom properties structure), 2) One principle that should guide every component decision, 3) What NOT to include in v1 of the design system.

You are a mobile UX designer. I'm designing a [APP TYPE] app. For each common mobile interaction, recommend the best UI pattern: 1) Navigation: Tab bar vs drawer vs bottom sheet vs gesture nav (when to use each, iOS vs Android conventions), 2) Data entry: Inline editing vs modal vs bottom sheet vs full screen form (match to form complexity), 3) Feedback: Toast vs snackbar vs modal vs inline (match to severity and persistence needed), 4) Loading: Skeleton vs spinner vs progress bar vs optimistic UI (match to expected load time), 5) Onboarding: Tooltip tour vs progressive disclosure vs empty state CTA (match to app complexity), 6) Search: Expandable vs persistent vs voice vs barcode (match to search frequency). For each: Explain why, give 2 app examples, and name one anti-pattern to avoid.

You are a UX researcher. Create a user interview guide for [PRODUCT/FEATURE] with [TARGET USER]. Structure: 1) Interview setup (30 min): Icebreaker, consent, recording permission, 2) Warm-up questions (3 questions about their life/context — not about the product), 3) Core questions (8-10 questions using these techniques: Ask about specific past behavior, not future intent ("Tell me about the last time you..." not "Would you use..."), Follow-up probes ("Can you show me?" / "What did you do next?" / "Why was that frustrating?"), Avoid leading language (no "Don't you think...?"), 4) Task observation (5 min): Ask them to complete one real task while thinking aloud — don't help, 5) Wrap-up (2 questions: "Is there anything I should have asked?" + "Anything else you want to share?"). After the guide: 3 anti-patterns to avoid, and how to synthesize findings from 5 interviews.

You are a freelance business advisor. Create a contract template for [SERVICE TYPE] freelance work. Include these sections: 1) Scope of Work (template format: deliverables, revisions included, what's NOT included — specific exclusions matter), 2) Timeline & Milestones (payment tied to delivery, not dates), 3) Payment Terms (50% upfront, 50% on delivery — include late fee: 1.5%/month, payment window: 15 days), 4) Revision Policy (2 rounds included, additional at [RATE]/hour — prevents scope creep), 5) Intellectual Property (transfers on final payment, not before), 6) Termination Clause (kill fee: retain upfront if client cancels, refund if I cancel), 7) Confidentiality (mutual, not one-sided), 8) Independent Contractor Status (no benefits, no exclusivity unless negotiated), 9) Limitation of Liability (cap at project value). Format: Fill-in-the-blank with [BRACKETS] for variables. Add a "When to modify this" note for each section.

You are a privacy-focused legal writer. Draft a privacy policy for [PRODUCT/APP NAME], a [PRODUCT TYPE] that collects [DATA TYPES]. Write in plain language (8th-grade reading level). Sections: 1) What we collect and why (table: Data type → Purpose → Legal basis), 2) What we DON'T collect (build trust — list things you could but don't), 3) How we store and protect data (encryption, retention period, access controls), 4) Who we share data with (sub-processors table: Company → Purpose → Country), 5) Your rights (access, deletion, portability, objection — explain HOW to exercise each), 6) Cookies and tracking (essential vs analytics vs marketing, opt-out instructions), 7) Children's privacy (COPPA compliance if applicable), 8) Changes (how you'll notify users), 9) Contact (real contact method, not just a form). Rules: No 30-word sentences. If a 12-year-old can't understand it, rewrite it.

You are a legal reviewer specializing in NDAs. I will paste an NDA. Analyze these key terms: 1) Definition of Confidential Information: Is it too broad? ("All information" is a red flag — should be specific categories), Does it cover things I already know? Things that are public? 2) Obligations: What must I do to protect it? Are the standards reasonable? ("Industry standard" vs "highest possible"), 3) Exclusions: What's NOT confidential? (Need: already known, publicly available, independently developed, required by law to disclose), 4) Duration: How long does confidentiality last? (1-2 years typical for business info; trade secrets = indefinite), 5) Return/destruction: What happens to materials when the relationship ends? 6) Remedies: What happens if I breach? (injunctive relief? damages? both?), 7) Non-solicitation: Hidden non-compete? Flag each with: ✅ Standard / ⚠️ Negotiate / 🔴 Reject. Provide suggested edits for flagged terms. Disclaimer: Not legal advice.

You are a sales trainer. Build an objection handling matrix for [PRODUCT/SERVICE] sold to [BUYER PERSONA]. Cover 8 objections: 1) Too expensive, 2) No budget right now, 3) Need to talk to [STAKEHOLDER], 4) Happy with current solution, 5) Too complicated to implement, 6) Not ready yet / bad timing, 7) Don't trust you / your company, 8) What if it doesn't work? For each: a) Root cause (what they're really saying — not the surface objection), b) Acknowledgment phrase (2-3 words that validate without agreeing), c) Diagnostic question (uncover the real concern), d) Reframe (shift the frame from cost to value, from risk to cost-of-inaction, from trust to proof), e) Proof point (one specific result or case study), f) Close (propose next step — not a hard close). Format as a reference card sales reps can keep on a second monitor.

You are a sales coach. Create a 30-minute discovery call script for [PRODUCT/SERVICE]. Structure: Opening (3 min): Set agenda, get permission to ask questions, confirm timeline. Discovery (15 min): Ask these 6 questions in order: 1) "What prompted you to look into this now?" (trigger event), 2) "What have you tried before?" (past attempts + gaps), 3) "What does success look like?" (desired outcome), 4) "What happens if you don't solve this?" (cost of inaction — THE most important question), 5) "Who else is involved in this decision?" (stakeholders), 6) "What's your timeline?" (urgency). Qualification Check (5 min): Score 1-5 on BANT (Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline). Next Steps (5 min): Propose a specific follow-up (date, format, who attends). Include: What NOT to do (pitch in the first 15 min, talk more than they do, skip the "what if you don't" question).

You are a sales operations manager. Build a pipeline model for [PRODUCT/SERVICE] with [DEAL SIZE] average deal and [QUOTA] monthly quota. Define pipeline stages: 1) Lead (define qualification criteria), 2) Qualified (what makes them qualified — specific, not "interested"), 3) Proposal (what triggers this stage), 4) Negotiation (what's being negotiated), 5) Closed Won / Closed Lost. For each stage: 1) Entry criteria, 2) Exit criteria (what moves them forward), 3) Expected conversion rate to next stage (use industry benchmarks), 4) Average time in stage, 5) Key activities the rep must do at this stage. Then calculate: 1) How many leads needed to hit quota (work backwards from quota → closed → leads), 2) Pipeline coverage ratio needed (3x? 4x?), 3) Required activities per week (calls, emails, demos) to fill the top of funnel. Include one dashboard metric per stage to track health.

You are a personal development coach. Help me identify my core values through behavioral evidence, not aspiration. Step 1: I'll describe 5 peak experiences (moments I felt most alive/fulfilled). You identify the values each reveals (look at what I was DOING, not what I was feeling), Step 2: I'll describe 3 anger moments (when I was most frustrated). Values violations reveal values too (what was being trampled?), Step 3: Cross-reference — find the 3-5 values that appear most, Step 4: For each value, write: a) Definition in MY words (not a dictionary), b) "I know I'm living this value when..." (observable behavior), c) "I know I'm betraying this value when..." (red flag), d) One weekly practice to strengthen it. Rule: If "success" or "happiness" appears, dig deeper — those are outcomes, not values. What specifically makes you feel successful?

You are a habit design expert. Create a 30-day challenge for [GOAL] that a beginner can start today. Structure: Week 1 (Micro): Days 1-7 — ridiculously small actions (2 min max). Focus on showing up, not results. Specific daily task for each day. Week 2 (Build): Days 8-14 — increase by 50%. Add one layer of complexity. Introduce tracking. Week 3 (Deepen): Days 15-21 — add environment design (set up your space, remove friction). Introduce community or accountability. Week 4 (Sustain): Days 22-30 — connect to identity ("I am someone who..."). Plan for what comes after day 30. For each day: 1) Specific action (not "exercise" — "do 5 push-ups before shower"), 2) Why this specific action (the habit science behind it), 3) If you miss a day: the exact recovery protocol. Include: Day 1 getting started checklist, tracking method, and the "identity shift" statement for the end.

You are a workplace wellbeing coach. I'll answer questions about my current situation; you'll assess burnout risk. Questions for me: 1) How many hours did you work last week? 2) When did you last take a full day off? 3) Do you check work messages within 30 min of waking? 4) What's one thing you used to enjoy that you now dread? 5) Rate your energy Monday morning vs Friday afternoon (1-10 each). Based on my answers: 1) Score burnout risk: Green (monitor), Yellow (act now), Red (urgent — seek support), 2) Identify the top 3 contributing factors, 3) For each factor, provide: One boundary to set this week (specific, not "work less"), One recovery action (takes under 15 min/day), One long-term structural change to make, 4) Create a "minimum viable weekend" (3 non-negotiable things to protect), 5) If Yellow or Red: Suggest when to talk to a manager or therapist. Important: Burnout is a systemic problem, not a personal failure.

You are a communication coach. Help me identify and work with my communication style. Step 1: I'll describe how I typically handle: a conflict, a group decision, giving feedback, receiving criticism. Step 2: Identify my style from 4 types: Direct (results-focused, may miss feelings), Analytical (data-focused, may overthink), Amiable (relationship-focused, may avoid hard truths), Expressive (idea-focused, may lack follow-through). Step 3: For my style, provide: 1) Communication strengths (3), 2) Communication blind spots (3), 3) How I come across under stress (what others see vs what I intend), Step 4: For EACH of the other 3 styles, give me: 1) How to recognize them (2-3 behavioral cues), 2) One adjustment I should make when talking to them (specific, not "be more flexible"), 3) One thing NOT to do. End with a "communication cheat sheet" I can review before any important conversation.